Animal Testing Attitudes Survey Template

People can care strongly about animal research while wanting more information about how it is conducted. Use this survey before planning an adult discussion or university outreach session. SurveyLegend helps collect viewpoints and information needs without treating disagreement as a lack of knowledge.

Decide which explanation or discussion topic deserves attention first. This version focuses on biomedical research involving living animals, not cosmetic-product testing. It separates self-reported familiarity, current position and requested information so the organizer can prepare a more relevant conversation.

This survey concerns research involving living animals to study health or disease. It does not cover cosmetic-product testing or routine veterinary care. All questions are optional. Share your current view and information needs without naming individuals or describing distressing incidents. There is no correct opinion to give, and this is not a knowledge test.

State the research context before asking for a position; changing from biomedical research to cosmetics changes the question’s meaning. Invite people with different views and explain how their responses will be used. Review the opening text and choices for leading questions . Avoid emotionally loaded labels, assumed benefits or assumed wrongdoing. If participants read material first, record what everyone received and describe the results as responses after that exposure, not as untouched baseline views.

Copy the complete prompt below, register with SurveyLegend, then paste it into SurveyLegend's AI survey creation tool. Review the generated questions and settings before sharing. Copying the prompt does not automatically transfer it into an account.

Report the full distribution of positions, including conditional views and people who have not formed an opinion. Do not convert skipped answers into neutrality. Familiarity is self-reported and cannot establish factual knowledge. Review topic priorities and preferred formats alongside written questions using open-ended analysis . Choose content that addresses the questions raised, rather than using the survey to identify people to persuade. Results from a voluntary audience describe respondents and should not be presented as national public opinion.

Sandgren and colleagues (2019) studied undergraduate students and faculty at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. In the results section, they explain that their confidence questions “do not measure actual knowledge”. The animal-research study supports keeping reported familiarity separate from factual assessment. Its student response rate was 9.8%, and its setting was one university; the findings should not be treated as everyone’s views. The questions here are original and do not reproduce or validate the study’s instrument.